Tennis Planet

Official Freaking Site Of Tennis Freaking Fans Worldwide.

Archive for May 18th, 2008

4 reasons why Federer cannot beat Nadal on clay.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

1. No one can batter Federer’s backhand with that much top spin and high bounce, relentlessly.

2. By the time Federer found the antidote to above, Nadal had already chalked up so many wins by then, that it got into Federer’s head irrevocably providing Nadal an insurmountable mental edge. That’s part of the reason Roddick had that record against Federer, over time.

3. Federer’s tactic to run around the ball, clearly to his backhand, to hit a forehand adds to the already soaring degree of difficulty that the top spin generates. While Nadal does that too, maybe more often than Federer, but there’s no mustard on the ball from Federer to create placement difficulties for Nadal.

4. Above depletes Federer’s power over time, taking the sting out of his shots. Federer may be athletic and have marathon runner like endurance, but in brute strength he cannot match Nadal. There comes a point in a match against Nadal, irrespective of the opponent, when the scales begin to tip in Nadal’s favor in sheer physical strength department. Unless you can come up with ridiculous shots to end the point quickly, the skill Federer clearly possesess but is taken away from him, because he is constantly fed on his backhand which is not as effective in getting there – you are inevitably taken to that torture chamber by Nadal, ending your journey slowly but surely.

Posted in Uncategorized | 24 Comments »

Dee’s message of peace. Thanks.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

Dee

I had no idea! This explains Adrian’s dream!
Have peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Love you all!!!
http://www.freakingnews.com/Peace-Pictures-40457.asp
http://www.freakingnews.com/Peace-and-Love-Pictures-40449.asp
http://www.freakingnews.com/Black-White-Handshake-Pictures-40455.asp

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

French number one Gasquet splits with coach. From Vonnie. Thanks.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

Vonnie

Tennis-French number one Gasquet splits with coach

PARIS, May 18 (Reuters) – Richard Gasquet parted company with coach Eric Deblicker one week before the start of the French Open, the French number one said on Sunday.

“Eric remains my friend and the one who helped me into the top 10,” Gasquet, who has won 10 matches and lost nine this year, said in a statement.

The 22-year-old Gasquet was knocked out in his first match at the Hamburg Masters earlier this week and was beaten in his first-round match at the Rome Masters.

Gasquet will now be coached by Guillaume Peyre along with Nicolas Mahut within Team Lagardere, the players’ management company.

(Reporting by Julien Pretot, editing by Alan Baldwin)

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »

Federer-Nadal in photos at Hamburg.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

Rafael Nadal from Spain, left, and  Roger Federer from Switzerland hold their trophies after the final against at the ATP Masters Series tennis tournament in Hamburg, northern Germany, on Sunday, May 18, 2008. Nadal won 7-5, 6-7, 6-3.

Spain's Rafael Nadal applauds as he celebrates his victory against Switzerland's Roger Federer in the final match of the ATP Marters series tournament in the northern German city of Hamburg on May 18, 2008. Nadal  won the match 7-5, 6-7, 6-3. AFP PHOTO DDP/ ROLAND MAGUNIA  GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read ROLAND MAGUNIA/AFP/Getty Images) 

Switzerland's Roger Federer puts on his shirt after his defeat by Spain's Rafael Nadal in the final match of the ATP Marters series tournament in the northern German city of Hamburg on May 18, 2008. Nadal won the match 7-5, 6-7, 6-3. AFP PHOTO DDP/ ROLAND MAGUNIA  GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read ROLAND MAGUNIA/AFP/Getty Images)

Switzerland's Roger Federer looks to the ground after losing a point to Spain's Rafael Nadal during the final match of the ATP Marters series tournament in the northern German city of Hamburg on May 18, 2008. Nadal won the match 7-5, 6-7, 6-3. AFP PHOTO DDP/ ROLAND MAGUNIA  GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read ROLAND MAGUNIA/AFP/Getty Images) 

Roger Federer from Switzerland holds his trophy after the final against Rafael Nadal from Spain at the ATP Masters Series tennis tournament in Hamburg, northern Germany, on Sunday, May 18, 2008. Four times champion of the Hamburg Masters Series Roger Federer was defeated by 5-7, 7-6, 3-6. 

Rafael Nadal from Spain reacts after the final against Roger Federer from Switzerland at the ATP Masters Series tennis tournament in Hamburg, northern Germany, on Sunday, May 18, 2008. Nadal won 7-5, 6-7, 6-3. 

Switzerland's Roger Federer returns the ball to Spain's Rafael Nadal during the final match of the ATP Marters series tournament in the northern German city of Hamburg on May 18, 2008. Nadal won the match 7-5, 6-7, 6-3. AFP PHOTO DDP/ ROLAND MAGUNIA  GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read ROLAND MAGUNIA/AFP/Getty Images) 

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments »

Press Conference with Roger Federer: Nadal. From cragger. Thanks.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

cragger

Hamburg, 18 May 2008

Press Conference with ROGER FEDERER

Nadal – Federer 7:5, 6:7 (3), 6:3

Q: Roger, wonderful match. It could have gone either way. Is there a
little thing you could have done to change the outcome?

FEDERER: I could have maybe served a little bit better. When I served
for the set, the second time where he broke me at 5:1, but I thought,
all in all it was allright. It wasn’t my best performance, if you get
broken so many times there is always something you are a little bit
unhappy about. But I think I am finding the right type of play from
the baseline. It’s up to me to serve maybe a bit better at important
stages. And attack maybe a bit more solidly. But it was a fun match
playing.

Q: Why do you think there were so much momentum swings. He had seven
games in a row and then I think you four games in a row.

FEDERER: I know. We had a similar thing in Monaco. I entered this
match thinking it won’t be anything like it, because we’ll hold serve.
It would be much harder to break serve. But then the same thing
happened again. It’s the way it is, we put a lot of balls into play,
and it seems hard to stop both of us.

Q: Considering Roland Garros, are you at the level you want to be?

FEDERER: Yes, I wish I could have won today, then I would have an even
better feeling. But I think there is not much of a change. The way the
match went today I can also say I feel well, the 3 hours wasn’t a
problem whatsoever. From a physical standpoint that is a good thing
for me. Maybe Rafael struggles a little bit more, because of the
stress level of the last few weeks. I just take two days off and I
will be in Paris practicing. It’s going to be fun next week and then I
will hopefully be ready for the tournament.

Q: You attacked in lots of different ways. Do you feel the variety of
what you use is increasing?

FEDERER: Yes, I think today particularly. I tried to be aggressive
from the backhand side. Before he started to open up much more from
the forehand to my forehand. He could do that very much at the
beginning. You always have to keep adapting to Rafa. I tried to do
that as good as I could. The serve would have helped for sure.

Q: What was the problem with the serve?

FEDERER: Not much. You hope they go. I have to go for big serves. But
he is a good return player.

Q: —

FEDERER: First, the problem is to play him on clay. He will break
one’s serve more than other players. But I don’t go into my service
games with the feeling that I’m going to be broken. He makes it
difficult because he practically doesn’t do any return mistakes. He
plays with a lot of spin. Since I am the one, who plays aggressive, I
usually have the risk on my side. When a game starts badly, it can go
really fast sometimes. That is okay. As long as I break his serve
enough times, that’s okay. I managed to that today, so I’m happy with
that. Still, I think that the victory hangs on my racket, because I
play aggressively. If I had served better today, who knows what would
have happened.

Q: —

FEDERER: I think it’s two feelings. For sure, it is a shame that I
lost here. At the beginning I had the feeling that it could go fast.
If I had won 6:1, I would have played up strongly. But you get over it
and honestly, now the focus is already on Paris. It was a nice match
and it wasn’t funny to lose. Nevertheless, the focus is in Paris now.

Q: He really ran a lot. Is that phenomenal for you?

FEDERER: He did not play more than I did. He lost first round in Rome.
So, he had a break there not to be forgotten. Of course, he is still a
bit injured but he will get over that. I don’t think the match was
specially tough for the body. The rallies weren’t that long, so it
wasn’t a problem for me. I don’t know how it was for him. He also
takes his time between the points in order to recover. That’s why his
matches are 1 hour and 40 minutes instead of an hour and 20. That’s
why sometimes it’s overestimated.

Q: —

FEDERER: Yes, I watched a bit of the Djokovic an Nadal match. It was
interesting. It was good how Djokovic played on clay. I don’t play
that way, that’s why I could not take so much out of it for myself.
But you can see that against most of the top players on clay Rafa is
mostly the defensive player who needs to run a lot. But he doesn’t do
a lot of mistakes and can sometimes turn things around and play
aggressively. That’s why he is so strong. He moves as good as nobody
else. That’s why he is just the best at the moment.

Q: …

FEDERER: No, he just plays his thing and it is sufficient, good, if
not, it’s a shame. He always plays with a big margin, always 2 m above
the net. That’s why he doesn’t do a lot of unforced errors. That’s why
it is easy for him to play that way. But you need incredible legs for
that and need to be defensive. And he knows how to do that.

That’s why it is a bit difficult. It is an advantage, but if you are
down, then it isn’t an advantage because he let’s the opponent back.
That is his problem on hard court. Maybe not as much on grass, because
he plays aggressively himself.

Q: —

FEDERER: If somebody starts running on clay, it is difficult to
suppress him with winners. That’s why he is so successful on that
surface.

Q: The impression you had from this week is that it was an ideal
tournament. What can the players do to influence the ATP?

FEDERER: No, the times are over. It’s in court. A lot of money is
involved. We tried as good as possible. Now, it’s crunch time and we
are quite curios ourselves. The result will come in August. Who knows
maybe it will be delayed and then the schedule for next year cannot be
done as the ATP is intending. So, I am really curios what will happen
during the next couple of months?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Nadal wins Hamburg title despite toughest road among the top three.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

Or did he win it because he had that tough draw, for both Federer and Djokovic were playing in the park until they met the king of clay.

Nadal may have scrambled to deny any opening to the two usurpers, but it appears things are getting tighter for him too, with Djokovic’s presence. Nevertheless, this was a must win for Nadal to have a good shot at winning his fourth Roland Garros in June. Not only did he boost his confidence with this win, he snapped the surge in conviction Djokovic was gaining since January. Had Djokovic defeated Nadal and fallen to Federer in the finals, Nadal would have been nowhere close to the state of mind he is in now.

Despite all that, he should be feeling a tug from Djokovic, like he has never felt in the entire time he has been battling Federer on the red surface. If the scenario was reversed, meaning Nadal facing Federer in the semis and Djokovic in the finals, Nadal may have succumbed to the grind of the last match.

The only and the ONLY reason he won a three hour match against Federer coming off another three hour battle with Djokovic, given his miserable record in similar circumstances in the past, was because he now practically owns Federer, mentally, like Federer once owned Roddick.

There can be ABSOLUTELY no other explanation to the string of matches that Federer has NOW lost to Nadal irrespective of the surface. The only reason Federer has won on hard and grass is because that mental domination loses it’s sting due to his overall record and his obvious superior game. With even that game clearly in decline with this seventh loss of the season with just one insignificant title so far, it will be interesting to see how the two match up on surfaces not called red. 

Nadal can and should take these two wins and turn them into fuel for his rocket to go after the number one rank one more time. Having reached the finals at Wimbledon for the last two years, and with Federer not even close to his form, he may still have a realistic shot at reaching the pinnacle, although momentarily, before Djokovic whitewashes everything, including Nadal’s own backyard.

When and where is that window? Till the end of this season. After that he will be fighting to remain among the top five, unless this spurt and confidence of defeating the world’s No. 1 and 3 back to back in three hour battles, morphs him into a beast on other surfaces too AND his knees don’t restart the dance like the last two years.

If you have nothing else to do with your miserable life and are stuck in a basement, you cannot ask for a better time. The battle is on, with new twists and turns emerging every freaking day. Although it’s still not enough to wake me up before 12 or delay my magazine ‘cardio’, the hospital rectum recovery department hasn’t seen me for a while. And I don’t like the TV channel switching at match point just because I farted. It’s frustrating to know where your TV remote is, but you still cannot use it, well, when you want to, that is. What a classy site this is!!!!!!!!

But I digress. Federer has to be at his wits end and at the peak of his frustration right about now. How else can you react after being ahead in two sets at two straight finals against Nadal only to flounder and lose that advantage just before the big occasion. Have you ever played at a playground where you were so much better than the rest of the players that you knew there’s nothing they can do to outmaneuver you? No you haven’t. Wrong question. Well Nadal is right there when he plays Federer. Next time don’t be surprised if there’s a bagel popping out.

Nadal has to have a giant sized confidence against Federer to be pulling out these kind of wins, all the more, under these circumstances. If there was room for bloating any further, this win should have accomplished that. With the age disparity between the two now moving in opposite direction, it is only going to get worse for Federer.

Maybe if Ferrer and Kiefer would have remained alive long enough to battle Federer instead of Verdasco and Seppi, it could have provided the cushion for Federer against this sudden shock in the finals. Although Djokovic was successful in dampening the effect to a great extent, it goes to show how far away Federer was from beating Nadal, despite Nadal without his most potent weapon, his energy. So much so that Nadal appeared fresher of the two in the third set. How’s that even possible when not only was Nadal ahead on the time on court stat by three freaking hours, but had a three hour battle just a day before, compared to about an hour for Federer.

According to Federer’s numbers, Nadal actually had played three extra matches by the time they squared up. Federer had 41 unforced errors, a stat that has now become a regular staple in his match against Nadal. He clearly appears to pull the trigger early to shorten the rallies, resulting in gifts to a raging bull. That’s the last thing he needs.

I think the Roland Garros window may have closed for Federer forever, right here. I mean this was the third straight clay court event, where Federer had a clear shot of winning the title, one of them purely because Nadal was already out. Other two, he led in the first two sets in both finals. And we have not even talked about Roland Garros yet.

Unless he pulls out what Sampras did at his last US Open, by proving everybody wrong and winning the title, this record leading up to the big one is not encouraging by any standards. Jose’s band aid theories cannot rectify such deep seated wound, crippling Federer from missing an ocean.

Now it’s between Nadal and Djokovic. No one other than Djokovic can now take down Nadal at Roland Garros. Period. Everybody including Nadal knows that. But Djokovic may, in doing so, help Federer win on June 8th if:

-Djokovic falls in Nadal’s half of the draw again.

-Either wins the semifinal or tires Nadal beyond the limits he did here.

-If Djokovic wins but is extended by Nadal in the semifinal, Federer has a better shot at defeating a tired Djokovic than a tired Nadal, due to the absence of that huge mental advantage Nadal enjoys over Federer. With eighty percent of Djokovic’s retirements coming on clay due to what that stuff does to his breathing apparatus, there is some history there providing the much needed edge to Federer.

Conversely, if Djokovic falls with Federer, Federer is toast.

However, despite all that and how it came about, in the last four clay tournaments, Federer has won one title and has reached two finals losing to Nadal both times. That’s a far cry from where he was before the clay season started. He had not reached a single final till then. So there are still some positives for Federer amongst all the rubble. With reinforcement arriving in the form of Jose, he should be looking to bounce back and not give in.

After all, if he wins Roland Garrros, everything that has happened this year will be washed away with one stroke. He will be crowned the GOAT and he could start fresh from then on at his home in Wimbledon.

Can we still hope for the illusive spark and title?

Posted in Uncategorized | 37 Comments »

cragger needs help.

Posted by tennisplanet on May 18, 2008

cragger

Does anyone know? I am looking for a website or source where I can see what the prize money is for singles/doubles winners in any event for the year. For example, what amount of money did Novak win in Rome and what is the amount in Hamburg, etc?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers