
Archive for August 23rd, 2008
Isn’t the color of your tongue the real barometer of your health? Or was last night that good?
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »
Now Yao has been replaced by a Sumo wrestler, covering both height and width. Next up: John McCain or Bob Dole.
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Evidence that even a smile cannot mask your real feelings.
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008

Is this also proof that teenagers are taking over and 21 is the new middle age in tennis?
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Did you know these tennis stats? No, you didn’t!!!!
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
Scarborough Research found that tennis fans are 54 percent more likely than the U.S. average to make more than $150,000 annually and 68 percent more likely to have a post-graduate degree.
Federer’s earnings over the past 12 months were $35 million, almost twice the take of Nadal, who earned an estimated $18 million.
Interest in tennis has been on the wane in recent years, particularly in the U.S. An average of 2.3 million people tuned in to Wimbledon telecasts during the past three years, according to Nielson Media Research. That is down 45 percent from the early 1990s.
Federer played tennis legend Pete Sampras in exhibitions in three cities across Asia and a fourth match at Madison Square Garden last fall. Federer’s haul came to $1 million per match.
Maria Sharapova is the world’s highest-paid female athlete with earnings of $26 million.
Roddick is the highest-ranked and most high-profile American player on the men’s side since the retirements of Sampras and Andre Agassi, which helped him nab deals with Lacoste, Lexus and SAP.
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »
If you have a body and are abusing it, here’s your wake up call. Should hospitals be now called morgues?
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
Serious patient errors at California hospitals disclosed in state filings
A month later, technicians at Dominican Hospital in Santa Cruz unintentionally placed a CT scan of one patient into the electronic file of another, leading physicians to remove the wrong person’s appendix.
Those incidents were among 1,002 cases of serious medical harm disclosed by California hospitals between July 2007 and May of this year. The disclosures are the first under a state law that requires hospitals to inform health regulators of all substantial injuries to their patients.
Officially called “adverse events,” those accidents are also known as “never events” because they are considered preventable, and many safety experts say they should never happen. California patients are being injured at a rate of about 100 a month, according to data compiled by the state Department of Public Health.
“I think the never events are a wake-up call to everyone about the safety of California hospitals,” said Beth Capell, a lobbyist for Health Access California, a consumer group.
Revelations of such errors have led lawmakers and hospital associations in at least seven states to protect patients from having to pay for the cost of care that went awry. In Sacramento, an assemblyman proposed a ban on reimbursing hospitals for the types of injuries tracked by the state. But when lobbyists for doctors and hospitals objected, he scaled it back to cover far fewer errors.
Four million people were admitted to California hospitals last year. State investigators found some errors occurred because hospitals failed to follow safeguards designed specifically to prevent harm.
Last July at UC San Diego Medical Center, a patient died after a nurse incorrectly programmed a medicine pump that then delivered more than twice the appropriate dose of a specialized blood pressure drug. Regulators found that the hospital’s administration had been warned earlier by its own safety committee that “errors continue to occur” with that type of pump but had not taken sufficient corrective action, according to a state probe.
UC San Diego officials said they have since held repeat drills with staffers who treat patients with Flolan and examined every step in the process.
Dr. Angela Scioscia, the center’s senior medical director, said the public reporting requirement is “a great opportunity to make rapid improvements” because hospitals can learn from one another’s problems. “We don’t want people to be afraid when they come into hospitals, because they are becoming safer and safer all the time,” Scioscia said.
Under the 2006 disclosure lawby state Sen. Elaine Alquist (D-Santa Clara), hospitals must inform state regulators of every occurrence of 28 different types of dangerous mistakes. Those include deaths during labor, medication errors, suicide attempts and sexual assaults.
The public health department has until 2015 to begin posting the information on the Internet, although officials said they hope to begin publishing it earlier. The most recent figures available cover the 10 months since July 2007. In that time, 466 patients developed bedsores so severe that the dead skin formed a crater or rotted through to the muscle or bone.
Another 145 patients had foreign objects such as surgical equipment left in their bodies. Thirty-four died while under anesthesia. In 41 surgeries, doctors performed the wrong procedure or operated on the wrong body part or on the wrong patient.
So far, the state Department of Public Health has levied $25,000 fines against 10 hospitals that reported adverse events. Officials said other investigations are still under way.
One hospital, Scripps Memorial in La Jolla, was fined twice for two errors that occurred last November with the same patient. First, as the patient was recovering from surgery, she was given a painkiller that is not supposed to be used after operations. When she went into respiratory arrest, the pharmacist provided a corrective medication at a dose 10 times too weak to be effective.
The patient survived. State investigators discovered that the hospital’s pharmacists had not been properly instructed in the use of 10 medications, including the corrective drug, that the hospital stocked for emergencies.
The ventilator errorat Stanford’s Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital occurred because a therapist had assembled the machine by following a diagram that had been drawn backward. Dr. Christy Sandborg, the hospital’s chief of staff, said the medical team quickly noticed that the ventilator wasn’t working correctly and stopped using it. The child recovered, she said, and the hospital has made changes to prevent future occurrences.
Overcrowded emergency rooms are another factor behind patient injuries. A 2006 study found that California had fewer emergency rooms per resident than any other state.
At Kaiser Foundation Hospital San Jose in March, staffers left a patient waiting in the emergency room for more than an hour after a test showed that his blood sugar was higher than the maximum measurable with a glucometer. The medics determined that he needed immediate care, but all 25 treatment bays were full. He passed out in the waiting room and died from heart failure.
Kaiser officials said that since his death, patients who need immediate care have been kept in the triage area under nursing supervision. The hospital said it also established a system to call in extra medical help when its emergency room is overwhelmed.
Doctors and hospitals warned against equating all adverse events with mistakes.
Debby Rogers, the vice president for quality and emergency services at the California Hospital Assn, said someone with a fractured neck might develop a pressure sore while resting on a backboard awaiting surgery. Treating the sore would require moving the patient, potentially paralyzing them by exacerbating the fracture, she said.
“We would like to think we can prevent all of them, but we can’t,” Rogers said.
Kathleen Billingsley, the deputy public health director in charge of regulating healthcare facilities in California, said that overall, “the hospitals are very responsive” about reporting injuries.
Dr. Donald Berwick, the president of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, a Massachusetts nonprofit, said the number of mistakes is certainly much higher than what California hospitals have disclosed. His institute has estimated that as many as 15 million patients nationwide are harmed each year in hospitals.
“It will always be true that the vast majority of incidents are never reported,” Berwick said.
Maine, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New York have restricted payments for avoidable medical errors. Hospital associations in Minnesota, Washington and Vermont have pledged never to bill patients for the costs of botched care, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Starting in October, the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services will stop reimbursing hospitals for eight kinds of mistakes, including bedsores, objects left in patients, and infections acquired during surgery or from catheters.
In April, Assemblyman Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles) introduced legislation to bar medical providers from seeking payment in cases involving any of the adverse events that California hospitals must report.
But the hospitals’ and doctors’ associations objected that the bill, AB 2146, could result in denial of payment even when the damage was not their fault, or occurred when they were repairing an injury caused by another medical provider.
Last week, Feuer rewrote the billso that the state MediCal program would no longer reimburse hospitals for the same preventable errors that Medicare refuses to pay for.
Feuer said he hopes that cutting payments will prod hospitals to be more careful.
“There’s a widespread recognition,” he said, “that the ‘never’ list is too long.”
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Is this ‘new era’ tennis bringing down the ‘peak’ age?
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
I mean, are the days of clowns winning Grand Slams in their late twenties or early thirties gone - forever?
With changes like slower courts, racket technology, shuffling of tournament schedule, bigger and stronger boys on the tour, emergence of power game, erosion of serve and volley building etc., has the game now become more demanding physically and mentally?
Is Federer just a statistic backing that phenomenon? Can you even imagine Nadal winning even Roland Garros, forget about any other major, at age 29, 30 or 31? Other than Borg, there has been no one in the entire history of the sport to start impressively in their teens and keep it up at least uptil age 26 and beyond.
Has tennis just been hit by the trend already apparent in other sports worldwide: Younger people pushing out the older generation earlier than past years? I mean there are already two teenagers rearing to go it, with the dominant players (Nadal and Djokovic) barely out of their twenties – Del Potro and Gulbis.
It’s virtually unheard of, that the most dominant player in the history of practically any sport unravelling like Federer has at age 25. Medically that’s your peak – physically. Does that make Federer’s mental frailty even more conspicuous, or is it just that the physical battering today is too much to deal with while getting to your peak years?
Every one of the previous greats of the game were able to win significant titles in their late twenties easily, although the progress slowed down after age 26. Even Borg could have continued and won something, at least based on his last year on the tour. I mean, he wasn’t falling apart like Federer is.
If that then is a reality, then the likelihood of another Connors and Agassi showing up is even more remote. Almost impossible, don’t you think?
It also may mean that unless you are ridiculously dominant like Federer was, within that small window now available, No. 14 is not going anywhere for a very long time – unless of course you are Nadal and starting like a bull right at the blocks in your early teens.
Same will then also be true of finishing six straight years as No. 1.
Sampras did get a scare but it may have also brought some ‘invincibility’ to his achievements, if longevity on the tour has really died forever. If Ken Rosewall is considered a Dinosaur now for what he was able to achieve, soon he will be labelled as a Neanderthal. Why?
Because it’s absolutely impossible to rake up all that in just four some years. If Federer couldn’t do it, you think someone can get even more dominant? He has to, don’t you think?
So should we then already crown Sampras as the GOAT with his combination of:
No. 14.
No. 6.
No. 7. and
No. 286.
Why not? Even Laver is without this complete package despite his two calendar Slams and the ‘weaker’ era he played in.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
I am confused. What would you be trying to say with this pose towards someone you are not very fond of?
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
Or am I not getting it at all, for this really is ‘what are you doing looking at someone in that position’?
Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »
You think you are a big freaking tennis fan? Then answer this.
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
![]()
Sampras is one of only two players in the history of the sport – open or shut era – to win a Grand Slam in his teens, twenties and thirties.
Who is the other one?
Posted in Uncategorized | 31 Comments »
Sampras’s four ‘significant’ records off the chopping block. What’s No. 6 & 7? And if you have no idea what the other two are, go drown yourself in the kitchen sink NOW!!! Geeeezzzz!!!
Posted by tennisplanet on August 23, 2008
-No. 14.
-No. 6.
-No. 7.
-No. 286.
Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments »

