Federer vs Seppi @ MC: Last game.

Life after tennis. Who will fail who will succeed?

If you have been out from under the rock for a while now, you know some clowns who have had some torrid time after they retired. From Borg to McEnroe to Tanner to Becker there are plenty of guidelines on what NOT to do after you leave tennis.

So who on the current tour is likely to sail over the potholes and who will find the material just too fascinating to ignore?

Safin: Is there any freaking doubt there? He must have already started something to get him going right after that Paris Masters Series this year.

Nadal: Again, is there any freaking doubt here? With so many level headed clowns surrounding him, the likelihood of him straying is none to slim.

Murray: The guy has demonstrated enough stupidity to strike him down as someone who will find the temptation to dabble with the risky stuff too much to resist. More on Becker’s path than Borg’s?

Federer: While he has the traditional family and upbringing to keep most of his choices within the OK compound, his overly emotional demeanor has a lot of potential of leading him down the wrong road. I mean the guy cries at everything. Winning, losing, marrying.

Wonder what will happen when the real adversity strikes. More like Borg pathway here?

Roddick: Unless Brooklyn Decker pulls off a total turnaround like Mrs Woods, Roddick is facing a very real possibility of a divorce lot sooner than even the outside people are predicting.

While he has kept it together on the tour despite some very serious adversity, he still carries traces of elements that can send the whole ship headed straight for the rocks.

Serena: She is the one I can put my money on that her life will go into a tailspin right after she is out of tennis and limelight, unless her designing gig keeps her involved and sane.

Djokovic: He appears to be getting more mature and smart every day now. Should have a brighter future than he will have on the tour once he retires if he continues to learn from his mistakes like he has done so far.

What the World Will Look Like by 2050.

Click here.

Interview with Nadal and Tony after MC opening round.

Photos.

You’ve got to be out for your freaking mind to think of Brooklyn Freaking Decker as marriage material. But maybe she may turn into another Mrs. Woods.

Did Federer lose in that ‘win’ over Seppi?

Granted this is the first match after a LOT of stuff, from nine months of hard court play to the wedding to a titleless crying session for three straight months, the pregnancy etc. but this was a classic tomato can.

If that wasn’t enough here’s some more:

-Three break point opportunities – offered.

-Just the bare minimum two breaks of serve out of five on the plate.

-47 percent first serve percentage.

I didn’t watch the match so I have to go with these numbers to tell me what was going on. Like I have said before, to me the break point opportunities offered gives away most of what transpired in a match.

I also heard that Nadal didn’t do too well either in his straight set ‘win’ providing some solace to Federer. But with so much to carry Federer needs to post couple of statement wins to get him recharged again.

The most telling stat, which is most independent of the surface, was the first serve percentage. And did three of those four aces come at break points?

Nadal is in no better shape either since he has to feverishly guard against dropping his guard this clay season in the absence of a real threat from Federer. Granted he has that calendar Slam and other obvious carrots to egg him on, but it’s easy to get a little complacent when the ONLY player to threaten you in the last four years is out of the equation at least on paper.

Was that the main reason other than the annoying opening round for the less than dominating showing?

It’s a long season but starting strong is half the battle for obvious reasons.

I mean serving at 56 percent when you average almost 70 and then to not only offer SEVEN freaking breaking points but to actually get broken twice to a player who hasn’t spelled tennis for what over a year?

That’s not going to get it done. Did the first three months of hard court play and the two big titles sap Nadal of the strength he needs to sustain the full clay season – with titles? 

Or have the past dominating seasons forced Nadal to mentally move to the finals prematurely taking these early rounds for granted?

Whatever it is both these clowns need to have some great early rounds to survive this season with some respect and glory. While Federer may seem not under as much pressure to deliver as Nadal, early loss will prove as devastating if not more than the AO final leading to another waterwork display.

Federer interview – Seppi. From Sarah. Thanks.

SARAH

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

R. FEDERER/A. Seppi
6-4, 6-4

An interview with: ROGER FEDERER

THE MODERATOR: Questions, please.

Q. Three match points. Was that a good kind of a workout; something you needed to get your confidence?

ROGER FEDERER: Well, I mean, not that. Just the match itself I thought was a good one to have as a first round. I knew there was going to be some long rallies with Seppi. He’s very happy, you know, just rallying. He’s very steady off both sides, you know. So on a good day he can be really dangerous. So I’ve already played him twice this year, which was kind of good going into this match, knowing what to expect.
I thought I played okay. I had a good stretch at the end of the first set, beginning of the second. Maybe could have made it easier for myself in the second. Had some opportunities. He hung in there and I didn’t play my best. But still happy I came through so good.

Q. What is the most challenging thing for you about the adjustments to clay?

ROGER FEDERER: Well, I mean, I guess things like getting used to the bad bounces. We’ve been playing on hard court now for nine months, is it, or eight? You know, you never see a bad bounce. So all of a sudden you’re a little bit worried, sometimes hitting half volleys because you know they can bounce onto your frame and stuff like that. You’ve just got to look for confidence that you find by playing matches and practice a lot, you know. As we don’t have much practice yet, you’re maybe a bit tentative.
And I guess just the sliding, knowing when to slide, how much to slide. Sometimes you slide but you don’t have to. Those kind of decision makings just happen naturally the more time you spend on the surface.

Q. When was your first contact with clay this year?

ROGER FEDERER: Maybe nine days ago.

Q. And do you know approximately how many hours you spent on clay this year before this match?

ROGER FEDERER: Sure. Maybe 10 or so.

Q. Is it something that you enjoy, playing on clay? Is there a challenge in it?

ROGER FEDERER: Well, I mean, it just feels natural to me because I played so much as a kid. I mean, I remember even wintertimes I used to play indoor clay, you know, under the balloon in Basel. So I played that until I was, you know, 14, basically I only played on clay. Then after that I went to the National Tennis Center, where indoors then was Supreme Court, hard court, which allowed me to improve my indoor skills and, you know, my fast court playing skills.

But the clay has always basically been my first surface, you know, I grew up on. So the sliding and all this comes to me within the first five minutes, then it’s just the timing, you know, how much you have to slide. This stuff just comes with time.

But I like the challenge, you know, the way the rallies are sometimes played. Of course, in a match like today or in the beginning of the clay court season, I feel there’s many errors from both ends, the rallies, the points finish in an error. That sometimes is disappointing, you know, because you play actually a good point and then in the end you miss by this much and it’s not a winner, it’s an error. On hard court and on grass courts, you’ve got to go and fetch the point a bit more, whereas here you can actually pretty much wait for an error from the opponent if you move him around enough.

Q. You mentioned bad bounces. Is that why you hold back the way you play your first few matches on clay?

ROGER FEDERER: Not really. You’ve got to be careful. I feel sometimes like you want to rally to find the rhythm, and then you realize, well, you’re giving the other guy rhythm, too. So it’s a fine line, you know, of how you want to play it.

Being offensive is good, too, you know, because you want to keep the points short sometimes and take away time from your opponent and rhythm. So it’s always a close call how you want to play. You got to read the situation well.

I felt like I had a bit of both: I think I played well on the offensive at times and also just being steady. I had enough to work too much defensively today, so maybe the next match I’ll get more of that.

Q. You played a few times versus Seppi. Did you find any change in his way of playing? Does he play always the same?

ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, like I said, he’s pretty happy, you know, just rallying from the baseline, being aggressive. He can play more aggressive. But to me it seems like he decides not to.

I definitely think he didn’t have a good serving day today. Because I’ve played him like in Australia and, I don’t know, was it here last year? Yeah, two years ago. I thought he served better then which helped him a lot to stay in the set and be dangerous because he’s a good return player.

I like his style. He stays very easy on his backhand and on his forehand. There’s no big upper body movement, you know, and that allows him to pick up tough shots quite easily and make it look nice. So I like his style, yeah.

Q. Are you looking forward to playing Stan? Second time this year.

ROGER FEDERER: Well, yeah. I mean, the XO, whatever, doesn’t count to me.

Of course, I like to play against him. I’m so happy he was able to take it to the next level last year, getting into the top 10, finally sort of making the break. Not really finally, because he’s always been a work in progress. He was always a guy taking one step back, two steps forward. So it’s nice to see him playing more consistently now on a regular basis.
It’s our first match on clay against each other. I’m excited to see how it’s going to turn out.

Q. Some players use sports psychologists seemingly more and more these days. Have you ever used one? What do you think of the idea of using one?

ROGER FEDERER: I had one back in ‘97/’98, I think, yeah, kind of during that time, for one and a half years. There it was more like anger management, you know (smiling). That was what it was about for me then.

I pretty quickly realized it was basically up to me and not someone else to tell me how to behave, because my parents were telling me anyway, friends as well. Other players were saying, What is wrong with you? That was just up to me to decide when I wanted to take that step and say, you know what, let’s try the quiet version of the Roger Federer. So that was pretty funny.

But, no, other than that, I never really considered one, you know. Honestly, I don’t know if many have used and that it’s been beneficial.

Q. Do you think they offer something to people, something extra to the players?

ROGER FEDERER: I don’t know. I think I feel like in different sports maybe I think they can be very beneficial. But I think tennis is quite a unique sport in the sense that we’ve got to take a decision so short term. I don’t know. There’s no time to waste. There’s no real trick behind winning a tennis match. You cannot sleep all night and still play great; and you can prepare as good as you can, you know, and play the worst match of your life. So there’s not a real preparation you can do really to make you play your best tennis.

Then decision making happens so quickly, and confidence is such a good factor that winning matches is what does it to you and losing matches does the opposite. So I think tennis is not the best example for that kind of stuff.

FastScripts by ASAP Sports

Tennis players’ favorite movies. From Rodaina. Thanks.

RODAINA

Favourite Movies
Here’s a video of some players mentioning their favourite movies. Apparently everybody likes Gladiator!! Oh and Roger likes the Rambos lol

Roger’s Interview: Seppi. From Sarah. Thanks.

SARAH

Roger’s Interview

Click here.