Tennis Planet

Official Freaking Site Of Tennis Freaking Fans Worldwide.

The ONE meaningful pedestal tennis greats stand alone on.

Posted by tennisplanet on July 6, 2009

-Federer: No. 15

-Sampras: Year end six straight years at No. 1.

-Laver: Two calendar Slams.

-Borg: What four Wimby / RG titles back to back?

-Connors: 109 titles.

-Lendl: ?

-Agassi: ?

-McEnroe: 82-3 match record for a year.

About these ads

14 Responses to “The ONE meaningful pedestal tennis greats stand alone on.”

  1. Ryan said

    Agassi has a Career Golden Slam.

    Nadal and Federer can equal this with a win at the US Open and at the Olympics respectively.

    • joao said

      Actually, Agassi is the only man to win:

      - Australian Open;
      - French Open;
      - Wimbledon;
      - Us Open;

      - The Olympics;

      - The Masters Cup;

      - Davis Cup;

      He’s the only one to have won all the major titles in the sport of tennis.

      • Ryan said

        And he married Steffi Graf. That has got to be count for something IMO.

      • somebody else said

        The only significant titles missing from Agassi’s trophy case are the MS shields for Monte Carlo and Hamburg. He has won all the other ones.

        Nevertheless, his career achievements seem to be the most complete.

      • MIKE__ said

        The Davis Cup is more like a Tier 2 event in terms of media attention and fan interest. The format is lame/anti-climactic and tennis needs to take a page from golf’s Ryder Cup to bring some excitement to it.

    • Gracie said

      Plus Agassi still has the most Master Series titles – 17 – though Rafa and Roger are catching up, with 15 each.

  2. Screwdriver said

    Lendl – most losses in grandslam finals :)

  3. MIKE__ said

    -Lendl: Having a winning H2H record against his arch-rival and nemesis.

    -Agassi: Career GS.

    -McEnroe: Forcing Borg to call it quits!

  4. pommesdesuisse said

    you are not going to give up the year-end-nonsense, are you?
    Sampras: 7 wimbledon-titles, 8 us open-finals, (ok, ok: 6 consecutive year-end-number 1′s!!!)
    Lendl: 18 (or was it 17?) consecutive finals (not GS or MS, but from one tournament to the freaking next!!), 8 consecutive us open-finals, 8 (or was it 9?) consecutive Masters-Cup-finals [hell, what's wrong with me, i used to be such a great Lendl-fan!]
    Federer: 21 consecutive GS-semifinals, 7 consecutive wimbledon-finals, 17 consecutive finals (or 16, it depends on how much Lendl had, cause i know that Fed is one short, there), 5 consecutive GS-titles at two different tournaments (wimbledon, us open), and last but not least: 237 CONSECUTIVE WEEK-END NUMBER 1′S!!! ;-)
    i agree with the rest…

    • pommesdesuisse said

      oh i got it wrong! (once again ;-) )
      Sampras of course doesn’t stand alone with 7 wimbledon-titles and 8 us open-finals. (i thought ‘what they stand for’, and not for ‘what they stand alone’)
      so, from that point of view Federer doesn’t stand alone with 16 (or 17) consecutive finals…

    • bunnee said

      i too loved lendl, for his stoic on-court style (& for his understated wit & humour off court).

      confirmations:
      * most consecutive singles finals: 18 (1981 & 1982)
      * most consecutive us open finals: 8 (1982-1989)
      * longest indoor winning streak (apr 1981 – jan 1983)
      * won 90+ matches in 3 consecutive years (1980-1982

      • pommesdesuisse said

        thanks, Bunnee…
        think about Lendl winning Wimbledon. he would have been considered a GOAT, don’t you think?
        just because of one tournament! ok, i admit, it’s a very important tournament – and so is the FO-title for Rog – but stats like these are way more impressive to me!!!!!!
        just like Roger said that it’s most probably ‘easier’ (whatever that means) to win every GS than winning 15 GS’s, or being in 21 consecutive GS-Semis, or 7 consecutive GS-finals…or every other freaking quantity-stat of Lendl’s or Federer’s…

        and if you add the quality-stats to the quantity-stats that Fed has, it’s COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS – do you read me, all of you ignorant Fed-hater-naysayers?! (and, of course, i’m not talking to you, Bunnee) – to state anything else than the Fed being the GOAT!!!!! and by farrrrrrrrr!!! fur surrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!

  5. Mary said

    Sampras – most weeks at #1 spot

  6. boxingary said

    It’s hard to believe that McEnroe could have a
    82-3 record in 1984 but only win TWO of the Slams that year…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers

%d bloggers like this: