| Round | Nadal | Federer | Djokovic | Murray | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Nishikori | Falla | Rochus | Hajek | |||
| 2nd | Blake | Massu | Dent | M&M | |||
| 3rd | Gulbis | Robredo/Tipsy | Montanes | Simon | |||
| 4th | Isner/Youzhny | Lopez | Monfils/Hewitt | Querrey | |||
| Quarter | Soderling | Berdych/Davydenko | Roddick/Cilic | Tsonga/Verdasco | |||
| Semi | Murray | Djokovic/Roddick | Federer | Nadal | |||
| Final | Federer | Nadal | Nadal | Federer | |||
Unless seeds fail to keep their date, Nadal is in for some serious fight starting with just the third round. Given that it will be a five set format all the way, Nadal will have to call upon each drop of energy he DID NOT expend at Queens. But the flip side of the coin is that the energy was saved at the expense of time on grass courts. If loss to Lopez at Queens was more due to fatigue from a devastating clay season, energy bar will come ahead of practice.
But history may not side with Nadal. Nadal’s only win at Wimbledon in ’08 came after he won the Queens title right after winning at Roland Garros, Hamburg, Barcelona and Monte Carlo. He bombed out in the opening round at Rome against Ferrero to provide the only break.
Does that mean fatigue trumps time on grass courts and that Lopez’s win was indicative of potential poor showing on grass courts? Can there be any other conclusion?









